This is what lies where madness fears to tread.In recent years, porn has taken the idea of the parody and turned it into something so far removed from its actual definition that you'd figure Alanis Morissette had written a song about it. A plethora of porn "parodies" have emerged over the past few years with some of the weakest titles and most random source material that you're likely to see. Gone are the days of such classics as "Edward Penishands", "Super Hornio Bros.", and "A Clockwork Orgy".
Maybe it's just me, but I consider a "That 70's Show" porn more random than this.Now, the porn parody world is dominated with titles that would make Friedberg and Seltzer proud. Simply take the name of the TV show or movie you are using and place it into a generic porn title like "This Is Not [INSERT TITLE]: A XXX Parody". While these titles do give you all the information you need, "This Ain't The Partridge Family XXX" doesn't have nearly the same charm and marketing appeal as something like "The Da Vinci Load 2: Angels and Semen".
I had a pic for "The Da Vinci Load 2", but it didn't look nearly this ridiculous.Perhaps the worst offender I've seen in this style is "This Isn't Twilight - The XXX Parody" put out by the folks over at Devil's Film. It's a parody in much the same way as you could say "Shindler's List" was a spoof of World War 2. As much as it pains me to say, I have to give at least some credit to Friedberg and Seltzer for knowing what a parody is, even if they do suck at making them. You have to change the situations or settings around a little, put in a funny twist that isn't expected. Hell, keep everything the same and just switch up the dialogue a little.
I know this is more or less what I was asking for, but yeah..... Fuck Friedberg and Seltzer."TIT-TXXXP" doesn't do any of these though. It uses sets that are as close to those in "Twilight" as they could find in the director's house/spacious back yard. The dialogue suffers on two fronts as it is A) Very poorly delivered even by porn standards and B) So close to the original material that they probably should have given Stephenie Meyer a writing credit. The actors could have changed things up a bit and pretended to have personalities. That would have been cool since we've yet to see any of that in an actual "Twilight" movie.
I seriously can't even tell these two apart any more. I think the one on the right isthe one the terrorists killed on 9-11.
As it is, this "spoof" is basically a carbon copy of a few disjointed scenes from a shitty movie, intercut with bouts of unappealing people getting their fuck on. I understand why people are watching these movies and it isn't for the hot girl-on-girl thespian action. But here's my thing, if they were going to more or less do away with the story altogether, why even bother putting one in? They could have excised the story completely and retitled this "White on Whites #24" and sold just as many units. For this movie to even have a story is superfluous and begs the question: "Who the hell was this movie even made for?!" Your average porn enthusiasts can get their wank on to any one of the BILLIONS of other videos out there. As for your average "Twilight" fan, they are either 10 year old girls obsessed with "Glee" and Willa Smith or 50 year old spinsters obsessed with their cats and tiny sweaters that can go on their cats. Neither of these seems particularly like the porn industry's target demographic. The only real option left is that this movie was made for people like me who would watch it and get so pissed off about it that they'd write something about it on the internet and inadvertently cause.. more... people....
Dear gods, what have I done?!
In case you were wondering just how bad the acting really is, I present to you now the ENTIRE MOVIE "This Isn't Twilight - The XXX Parody" (sans all the porny bits). Enjoy??!
